You are viewing an old version of this page. Return to the latest version.
Difference between revisions of "Pianotec on Odroid-N2"
(→Operating System) |
(→Software) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== ARM 32 vs. AARCH64 === | === ARM 32 vs. AARCH64 === | ||
* [https://www.cnx-software.com/2016/03/01/64-bit-arm-aarch64-instructions-boost-performance-by-15-to-30-compared-to-32-bit-arm-aarch32-instructions/ CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions] | * [https://www.cnx-software.com/2016/03/01/64-bit-arm-aarch64-instructions-boost-performance-by-15-to-30-compared-to-32-bit-arm-aarch32-instructions/ CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions] | ||
+ | * I still hope, that [https://www.modartt.com/ Modartt] will supply [https://www.modartt.com/pianoteq Pianoteq] sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? | ||
=== Pianotec Stage === | === Pianotec Stage === |
Revision as of 14:01, 24 May 2020
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2
Contents
Software
ARM 32 vs. AARCH64
- CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions
- I still hope, that Modartt will supply Pianoteq sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported?
Pianotec Stage
- coming soon
CPU Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark by Marcos Daniel
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2