Difference between revisions of "Pianoteq on Odroid-N2"
(Created page with "> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianoteq and Odroid-N2 ---- == '''ARM 32 vs. AARCH64''' == * [https://www.cnx-software.com/2016/03/01/64-bit-arm-aarch64-instru...") |
(→CPU Performance Benchmarks) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[File:Piano-Expander-Bechstein.jpg|300px]] [[File:Piano-Expander-MK2.jpg|300px]] | [[File:Piano-Expander-Bechstein.jpg|300px]] [[File:Piano-Expander-MK2.jpg|300px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | =='''Optimize the Installation for Realtime'''== | ||
| + | * edit the file /etc/security/limits.conf and add the following 3 lines: | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | @pianoteq - rtprio 90 | ||
| + | @pianoteq - nice -10 | ||
| + | @pianoteq - memlock 500000 | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
==''' CPU Performance Benchmarks '''== | ==''' CPU Performance Benchmarks '''== | ||
Latest revision as of 15:52, 15 April 2022
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianoteq and Odroid-N2
Contents
ARM 32 vs. AARCH64
- CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions
- I still hope, that Modartt will provide Pianoteq sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way....
Pianoteq 6 Stage Installation on Odroid
- coming soon
Some pictures
Optimize the Installation for Realtime
- edit the file /etc/security/limits.conf and add the following 3 lines:
@pianoteq - rtprio 90 @pianoteq - nice -10 @pianoteq - memlock 500000
CPU Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark by Marcos Daniel
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianoteq and Odroid-N2