You are viewing an old version of this page. Return to the latest version.
Difference between revisions of "Pianotec on Odroid-N2"
(→Some pictures) |
(→Some pictures) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=== Some pictures === | === Some pictures === | ||
| − | [[File:First-Test-Setup-2.jpg|300px]] | + | [[File:First-Test-Setup-2.jpg|300px]] [[File:First-Test-Setup-1.jpg|300px]] |
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:Piano-Expander-Bechstein.jpg|300px]] [[File:Piano-Expander-MK2.jpg|300px]] |
| − | |||
| − | [[File:Piano-Expander- | ||
==''' CPU Performance Benchmarks '''== | ==''' CPU Performance Benchmarks '''== | ||
Revision as of 15:13, 24 May 2020
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2
Contents
ARM 32 vs. AARCH64
- CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions
- I still hope, that Modartt will provide Pianoteq sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way....
Pianotec 6 Stage Installation on Odroid
- coming soon
Some pictures
CPU Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark by Marcos Daniel
Results
- coming soon
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2