You are viewing an old version of this page. Return to the latest version.
Difference between revisions of "Pianotec on Odroid-N2"
(→ARM 32 vs. AARCH64) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | ==''' | + | == '''ARM 32 vs. AARCH64''' == |
| − | |||
* [https://www.cnx-software.com/2016/03/01/64-bit-arm-aarch64-instructions-boost-performance-by-15-to-30-compared-to-32-bit-arm-aarch32-instructions/ CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions] | * [https://www.cnx-software.com/2016/03/01/64-bit-arm-aarch64-instructions-boost-performance-by-15-to-30-compared-to-32-bit-arm-aarch32-instructions/ CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions] | ||
* I still hope, that [https://www.modartt.com/ Modartt] will provide [https://www.modartt.com/pianoteq Pianoteq] sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way.... | * I still hope, that [https://www.modartt.com/ Modartt] will provide [https://www.modartt.com/pianoteq Pianoteq] sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way.... | ||
| − | == | + | ==''' Pianotec 6 Stage Installation on Odroid '''== |
* coming soon | * coming soon | ||
| − | == | + | ==''' CPU Performance Benchmarks '''== |
| − | + | === Benchmark by Marcos Daniel === | |
*[https://github.com/marcosdanielfl/ptq_bench/blob/master/ptq_benc.c Github: ptq_bench.c] | *[https://github.com/marcosdanielfl/ptq_bench/blob/master/ptq_benc.c Github: ptq_bench.c] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Results ==== | ||
| + | * coming soon | ||
---- | ---- | ||
> [[Main Page]] > [[Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2]] | > [[Main Page]] > [[Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2]] | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 24 May 2020
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2
Contents
ARM 32 vs. AARCH64
- CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions
- I still hope, that Modartt will provide Pianoteq sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way....
Pianotec 6 Stage Installation on Odroid
- coming soon
CPU Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark by Marcos Daniel
Results
- coming soon
> Main Page > Piano Expander based on Pianotec and Odroid-N2