Difference between revisions of "Pianotec on Odroid-N2"

Revision as of 14:03, 24 May 2020

CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions
I still hope, that Modartt will provide Pianoteq sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported? Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way....

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 === ARM 32 vs. AARCH64 ===
 * [https://www.cnx-software.com/2016/03/01/64-bit-arm-aarch64-instructions-boost-performance-by-15-to-30-compared-to-32-bit-arm-aarch32-instructions/ CNX-Software: 64-bit ARM (Aarch64) Instructions Boost Performance by 15 to 30% Compared to 32-bit ARM (Aarch32) Instructions]
-* I still hope, that [https://www.modartt.com/ Modartt] will supply [https://www.modartt.com/pianoteq Pianoteq] sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported?  Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way....
+* I still hope, that [https://www.modartt.com/ Modartt] will provide [https://www.modartt.com/pianoteq Pianoteq] sometimes compiled for AARCH64 architecture. In my opinion 32-bit code on any ARM module (Raspberry PI, Banana PI, Odroid etc.) which could also use AARCH64 code doesn't make sense. Modules which provide only ARM-32 bit architecture don't have the calculation power for Pianoteq. So why should those CPUs be supported?  Canceling 32-bit support and switching to AARCH64 would be the right way....
 === Pianotec Stage ===